antigenic drift - mechanism for variation involving the accumulation of mutations in genes that code for proteins that are under selective pressure by antibodies
vaccination with a strain from a novel antigenic cluster boosts antibodies against both the vaccination strain and historical influenza strains in children
study design
cohort study
children aged 5-17 years
subjects recruited on previous exposure
2014-15 IIV and uninfected n ~ 80
2014-15 flu A infected n ~ 20
2010-15 unvaccinated and uninfected n ~ 80
2014-15 vax: A/Texas/50/2012
2014-15 circ: A/Switzerland/9715293/2013
study design
tested 4 viruses
A/Switzerland/9715293/2013
A/Texas/50/2012
A/Victoria/361/2011
A/Wuhan/359/1995
2014-15 vaccination status
unvaccinated: 34 (27%)
vaccinated IIV: 77 (62%)
vaccinated LAIV: 13 (11%)
PCR confirmed influenza
2012-13: 10 (8%) A/Texas/50/2012-like
2014-15: 22 (18%) A/Switzerland/9715293/2013
using regression to model and predict qualitative and quantitative variables
examines the relationship between the response (dependent) variable and predictor (independent) variables
linear regression: quantitative response
logistic regression: qualitative response
predict responses while adjusting for confounding factors
how multiple regression works
how multiple regression works
linear regression analysis
response: post-vaccination HI titer
predictors:
mean fold increase against A/Switzerland/9715293/2013
baseline HI titer
age
high-risk condition
vaccination status
PCR confirmed infection status
logistic regression analysis
response: post-vaccination seroprotection
predictors:
mean fold increase against A/Switzerland/9715293/2013
baseline HI titer
age
high-risk condition
vaccination status
PCR confirmed infection status
vaccination increases the number of seroprotected subjects against the previous season strain
A/Texas/50/2012 HI titer ≥ 1:40
29 subjects had baseline HI titer < 1:40
15 (52%) of those subjects had a post-vaccination HI titer ≥ 1:40
A/Texas/50/2012 HI titer ≥ 1:110
114 subjects had baseline HI titer < 1:110
12 (11%) of those subjects had a post-vaccination HI titer ≥ 1:110
vaccination increases the number of seroprotected subjects against the previous season strain
(A/Texas/50/2012 HI titer ≥ 1:40) 2-fold increase in HI titer against A/Switzerland/9715293/2013
13.1-fold increased odds of seroprotection
95% CI 2.74 - 235
P = 0.01
(A/Texas/50/2012 HI titer ≥ 1:110) 2-fold increase in HI titer against A/Switzerland/9715293/2013
2.9-fold increased odds of seroprotection
95% CI 1.64 - 5.76
P = 0.0008
conclusions
working around influenza exposure in humans is incredibly tricky
seasonal influenza vaccination provides a small but real boost to antibodies against historical antigens
few participants were boosted to an HI titer ≥ 1:110 against A/Texas/50/2012 suggesting the historical boost may not be clinically significant for children
future directions
understand the mechanism behind back-boost
stimulation of memory B cells recalling historical antibodies
activation and maturation of B cells producing cross-reactive antibodies
further examine the clinical significance of the back-boost
the broader impact
development of novel influenza vaccines exceedingly difficult
influenza vaccine correlates of immunity are not well understood
better methods of evaluating and designing current vaccines could provide better protection